Abstract :
Although long championed, a global language has not come to fruition
despite considerable efforts. Many fear that such a language
would undermine the particularistic, identity-constituting primary languages
of local and national communities. These concerns can be
addressed at least in part by utilizing a two-tiered approach in which
efforts to protect primary languages are intensified at the same time
that a global language is adopted as an additional language and not as
a substitutive one. Although the U.N. or some other such global organization
could, theoretically, choose a language to serve as the global
language, English is already (and increasingly) occupying this position
as a result of the colonial period and post-colonial developments. In
this respect, English is compared to the development of the railroad
system in the United States, which although introduced at considerable
human costs by overpowering corporations, later became an integral
part of the economy and society. Whether English should be adopted
as a second language, or as a third or fourth one, is heavily influenced
by the level of difficulty involved—the labor to fluency ratio—in acquiring
a new language.
Keywords :
particularistic , global language , community , English