Nutritional status and assessment of patients on home parenteral nutrition: anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance, or clinical judgment?

The optimal method of assessing protein energy nutritional status in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is unknown. We evaluated protein energy nutritional status in 47 outpatients (23 male; 24 female) on HPN by measuring anthropometry, plasma proteins, and lymphocyte counts and compared these with the results of subjective clinical assessment and bioelectrical impedance measurements. Sixteen of the 47 patients (34%) were underweight (body mass index <5th percentile of the reference) and 21 (45%) were below the 5th percentile of the reference for both triceps skinfold thickness and midarm muscle circumference. Plasma proteins were subnormal in 1–5 patients (2–11%). Lymphocyte counts were subnormal in 19 patients (40%). Clinical assessment classified 23 patients (49%) as well nourished and 24 (51%) as moderately malnourished. Moderately malnourished patients had a significantly lower body mass index than well-nourished patients (P = 0.02). Clinical assessment did not correlate with bioelectrical impedance analysis. Fat-free mass determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis resulted in values up to 9.4 kg lower and 8 kg higher than fat-free mass obtained by anthropometry. Weighing combined with a subjective clinical assessment is sufficient for evaluation of protein calorie nutritional status in patients on HPN.