Title of article :
Cost-effectiveness of five burrow fumigants for managing black-tailed prairie dogs
Author/Authors :
Scott E. Hygnstrom، نويسنده , , Kurt C. VerCauteren، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Pages :
10
From page :
159
To page :
168
Abstract :
We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of two solid form burrow fumigants (aluminum phosphide and gas cartridges) and three pressurized gas–liquid burrow fumigants (methyl bromide, chloropicrin, and a methyl bromide–chloropicrin mixture) for managing black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Fifty-two variable-sized plots, including 25 treatment and 25 control burrows, were established within 13 prairie dog colonies in central Nebraska during spring 1989. Each group of 25 treatment burrows was fumigated with one of the five fumigants according to label directions or manufacturer recommendations. All five fumigants reduced burrow activity 95–98%, as measured by a plugged burrow technique. No significant differences in efficacy (P=0.453) were detected among the five treatments. Total costs for materials and labor for the aluminum phosphide and gas cartridges, excluding application equipment, were twice ($75.00 to $96.88 ha−1) the cost of the pressurized gas–liquid fumigants ($37.67 to $41.76 ha−1). Costs for the application equipment were considerably higher for the pressurized materials. Each treatment required labor for burrow plugging, which accounted for 50–75% of the total cost. None of the products tested met all requirements of a proposed selection criteria for fumigants.
Keywords :
chloropicrin , Cynomys spp , economics , Fumigants , methyl bromide , Prairie dog , Animal damage control , Aluminum Phosphide , Gas cartridges
Journal title :
International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation
Serial Year :
1999
Journal title :
International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation
Record number :
732419
Link To Document :
بازگشت