• Title of article

    Uranium transport through fractured silicic tuff and relative retention in areas with distinct fracture characteristics Original Research Article

  • Author/Authors

    English C. Pearcy، نويسنده , , James D. Prikryl، نويسنده , , Bret W. Leslie، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1995
  • Pages
    20
  • From page
    685
  • To page
    704
  • Abstract
    The Nopal I uranium (U) deposit, in the Pefia Blanca District, Chihuahua, Mexico, has been identified as analogous in some regards to the candidate U.S. high-level waste (HLW) repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Uranium transport at the Nopal I deposit has been studied to investigate mechanisms by which HLW components could be transported through silicic tuff over long time periods. This investigation focused on approximately 1400 m2 of essentially continuous bedrock outcrop spanning the Nopal I deposit and surrounding host tuff. Data collected document: (i) the distributions of U within and around the Nopal I deposit, (ii) the distribution and characteristics of the fracture network within and surrounding the deposit, and (iii) the transport of U away from the deposit mainly along fracture paths. Uranium-series isotopic measurements indicate mobilization of U along the margin of the deposit within the last 1 Ma and significant U transport at about 54 Ka. Transport of U away from the Nopal I deposit along a few relatively continuous mesofractures achieved maximum distances at least 20 times greater than transport through the general fracture network composed of thousands of less continuous microfractures within and surrounding the deposit. Uranium transport away from the deposit appears to be largely independent of variations in the general fracture network pattern. Transport of U away from individual micro- and meso-fractures into homogeneous, unfractured tuff matrix appears limited to distances less than 1 mm. At the Nopal I deposit, matrix diffusion does not appear to have been an important factor for retardation of U. This analysis suggests a ranking for U retention: (i) microfracture network retention much greater-than mesofracture retention, and (ii) individual microfracture retention much greater-than matrix retention.
  • Journal title
    Applied Geochemistry
  • Serial Year
    1995
  • Journal title
    Applied Geochemistry
  • Record number

    739441