Title of article :
Evaluation of methods for the determination of diesel-generated fine particulate matter: Physical characterization results
Author/Authors :
John S. Kinsey، نويسنده , , William A. Mitchell، نويسنده , , William C. Squier، نويسنده , , Kara Linna، نويسنده , , Foy G. King Jr.، نويسنده , , Russell Logan، نويسنده , , Yuanji Dong، نويسنده , , Gregory J. Thompson، نويسنده , , Nigel N. Clark، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages :
25
From page :
63
To page :
87
Abstract :
A multi-phase instrument comparison study was conducted on two different diesel engines on a dynamometer to compare commonly used particulate matter (PM) measurement techniques while sampling the same diesel exhaust aerosol and to evaluate inter- and intra-method variability. Included in this evaluation were a Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM), three Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers (SMPSs), a Condensation Particle Counter (CPC), a TSI DustTrak, a MET-One E-BAM, and two Electrical Low Pressure Impactors (ELPIs) as well as two types of time-integrated filter samplers. Of the five on-line analyzers evaluated for PM mass concentration, the TEOM was shown to have the best overall correlation to the gravimetric filter method. For measuring concentration by particle number, the two ELPIs and the Model 3936L25 SMPS provided generally comparable results during both test phases (data for the stand-alone CPC were invalidated). With respect to measuring particle size distribution (PSD) by gravimetric analysis, the ELPIs were not found to be useful for a variety of reasons whereas for differential number distribution, the SMPSs and ELPIs provided generally comparable results.
Keywords :
Particulate matter , Diesel exhaust , instrumentation , Particle size distribution
Journal title :
Journal of Aerosol Science
Serial Year :
2006
Journal title :
Journal of Aerosol Science
Record number :
743068
Link To Document :
بازگشت