Title of article :
Fuel-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from alternative fuels in Australian heavy vehicles
Author/Authors :
Tom Beer، نويسنده , , Tim Grant، نويسنده , , David Williams، نويسنده , , Harry Watson، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages :
11
From page :
753
To page :
763
Abstract :
This paper quantifies the expected pre-combustion and combustion emissions of greenhouse gases from Australian heavy vehicles using alternative fuels. We use the term exbodied emissions for these full fuel-cycle emissions. The fuels examined are low sulfur diesel (LSD), ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULS), compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), ethanol (from lignocellulose), biodiesel and waste oil. Biodiesel and ethanol have the lowest exbodied greenhouse gas emissions (in grams greenhouse gases per kilometre travelled). Biodiesel reduces exbodied greenhouse gas emissions from 41% to 51% whereas ethanol reduces emissions by 49–55%. In fact, both emit larger quantities of CO2 than conventional fuels, but as most of the CO2 is from renewable carbon stocks that fraction is not counted towards the greenhouse gas emissions from the fuel. The gaseous fuels (LPG, CNG) come next with emissions that range from 88% to 92% of diesel. The emissions of greenhouse gases from diesel are reduced if waste oil is used as a diesel extender, but the processing energy required to generate LSD and ULS in Australia increase their greenhouse gas emissions compared to diesel fuel. The extra energy required liquefy and cool LNG means that it has the highest exbodied greenhouse gas emissions of the fuels that were considered.
Keywords :
Greenhouse gas emissions , Alternative fuels , Life-cycle , Heavy vehicles , Australian emissions
Journal title :
Atmospheric Environment
Serial Year :
2002
Journal title :
Atmospheric Environment
Record number :
756897
Link To Document :
بازگشت