• Title of article

    A pesticide emission model (PEM) Part II: model evaluation

  • Author/Authors

    M. T. Scholtz، نويسنده , , E. Voldner، نويسنده , , B. J. Van Heyst، نويسنده , , A. C. McMillan، نويسنده , , E. Pattey، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    5015
  • To page
    5024
  • Abstract
    In the first part of the paper, the development of a numerical pesticide emission model (PEM) is described for predicting the volatilization of pesticides applied to agricultural soils and crops through soil incorporation, surface spraying, or in the furrow at the time of planting. In this paper the results of three steps toward the evaluation of PEM are reported. The evaluation involves: (i) verifying the numerical algorithms and computer code through comparison of PEM simulations with an available analytical solution of the advection/diffusion equation for semi-volatile solutes in soil; (ii) comparing hourly heat, moisture and emission fluxes of trifluralin and triallate modeled by PEM with fluxes measured using the relaxed eddy-accumulation technique; and (iii) comparison of the PEM predictions of persistence half-life for 29 pesticides with the ranges of persistence found in the literature. The overall conclusion from this limited evaluation study is that PEM is a useful model for estimating the volatilization rates of pesticides from agricultural soils and crops. The lack of reliable estimates of chemical and photochemical degradation rates of pesticide on foliage, however, introduces large uncertainties in the estimates from any model of the volatilization of pesticide that impacts the canopy.
  • Keywords
    soil , Heat moisture solute fluxes , Hourly emissions , triallate , Persistence , Relaxed eddy-accumulation , Trifluralin , Canopy
  • Journal title
    Atmospheric Environment
  • Serial Year
    2002
  • Journal title
    Atmospheric Environment
  • Record number

    757284