Title of article
Inference in ecology and evolution
Author/Authors
Philip A. Stephens، نويسنده , , Steven W. Buskirk، نويسنده , , Carlos Martinez del Rio، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Pages
6
From page
192
To page
197
Abstract
Most ecologists and evolutionary biologists continue to rely heavily on null hypothesis significance testing, rather than on recently advocated alternatives, for inference. Here, we briefly review null hypothesis significance testing and its major alternatives. We identify major objectives of statistical analysis and suggest which analytical approaches are appropriate for each. Any well designed study can improve our understanding of biological systems, regardless of the inferential approach used. Nevertheless, an awareness of available techniques and their pitfalls could guide better approaches to data collection and broaden the range of questions that can be addressed. Although we should reduce our reliance on significance testing, it retains an important role in statistical education and is likely to remain fundamental to the falsification of scientific hypotheses.
Journal title
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Serial Year
2007
Journal title
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Record number
772029
Link To Document