Title of article
Is conservation triage just smart decision making?
Author/Authors
Madeleine C. Bottrill، نويسنده , , Liana N. Joseph، نويسنده , , Josie Carwardine، نويسنده , , Michael Bode، نويسنده , , Carly Cook، نويسنده , , Edward T. Game، نويسنده , , Hedley Grantham، نويسنده , , Salit Kark، نويسنده , , Simon Linke، نويسنده , , Eve McDonald-Madden، نويسنده , , Robert L. Pressey، نويسنده , , Susan Walker، نويسنده , , Kerrie A. Wilson، نويسنده , , Hugh P. Possingham، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages
6
From page
649
To page
654
Abstract
Conservation efforts and emergency medicine face comparable problems: how to use scarce resources wisely to conserve valuable assets. In both fields, the process of prioritising actions is known as triage. Although often used implicitly by conservation managers, scientists and policymakers, triage has been misinterpreted as the process of simply deciding which assets (e.g. species, habitats) will not receive investment. As a consequence, triage is sometimes associated with a defeatist conservation ethic. However, triage is no more than the efficient allocation of conservation resources and we risk wasting scarce resources if we do not follow its basic principles.
Journal title
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Serial Year
2008
Journal title
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Record number
772241
Link To Document