• Title of article

    Provision of clinically based information improves patientsʹ perceived length of stay and satisfaction with EP

  • Author/Authors

    T.Paul Tran، نويسنده , , Warren P. Schutte، نويسنده , , Robert L. Muelleman، نويسنده , , Michael C. Wadman، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
  • Pages
    4
  • From page
    506
  • To page
    509
  • Abstract
    We conducted a focused, prospective, randomized study to evaluate whether periodic personal provision of clinically based information to patients during an Emergency Department (ED) visit improves patientsʹ perceptions of physicianʹs excellence and efficiency of patient care. Six hundred nineteen consecutive adult patients or proxy informants, who were evaluated in the ED and subsequently discharged, were randomized into the standard of care (n = 307) and intervention group (n = 312). Under supervision by ED attending physicians, a single research assistant periodically provided patients with process and medical information at 15-minute intervals, starting at arrival and continuing through until discharged from the ED. At discharge, patients were handed a previously validated questionnaire to fill out and drop off at the ED exit. Outcome measures included actual and patientsʹ estimate of the wait time (WT) and length of stay (LOS), ratings of registration personnel, and ratings of bedside and technical skills of nurses and Emergency Physicians (EPs), by using a 5-point Likert scale (5 = excellent, 4 = very good, 3 = good, 2 = fair, 1 = poor). There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, insurance data, intensity of service, actual WT, actual LOS, and patientsʹ perceived WT to see a physician between the 2 groups. The perceived LOS was, however, significantly shorter (92.6 vs. 105.5 min, P = .027) and the proportion of patients who rated the Emergency Staff Physician as “excellent” or “very good” was significantly higher in the intervention group (Bedside: 87.1% vs. 80.5%, P = .033; Technical skill: 86.8% vs. 80.1%, P = .032). Patientsʹ perception of nursing skills were, however, statistically similar in the 2 groups (Bedside: 83.1% vs. 83.0%, P = .942; Technical skill: 84.5% vs. 82.7%, P = .613). Given the sample size and observed proportions, the χ2 analysis of perception of nursing skill had a power of 4.8% (registered nurse [RN] bedside) and 7.5% (RN technical skill). Periodic personal interaction and provision of clinically based information in the ED is thought to improve patientsʹ perceived LOS, efficiency, and clinical skills of EP after an ED visit. (
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Serial Year
    2002
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  • Record number

    780246