Reconceptualising the outcomes of Continuing Professional Development

This paper considers the potential outcomes, both positive and negative, of continuing professional development from the perspectives of practitioners and managers. Following a consideration of the literature it draws upon data collected during a 3-year evaluation of the English National Board Framework and Higher Award to highlight divergent views and tensions within Continuing Professional Development (CPD). Considerable discrepancies between practitioners and managers emerge which raise a number of searching questions about the value each group accords to continuing professional development. Based on the data a new framework for conceptualising the outcomes of CPD is presented which fundamentally undermines a quasi-market approach.