Title of article :
The effect of different electrostatic potentials on docking accuracy: A case study using DOCK5.4
Author/Authors :
Keng-Chang Tsai، نويسنده , , Sheng-Hung Wang، نويسنده , , Nai-Wan Hsiao، نويسنده , , Minyong Li، نويسنده , , Binghe Wang، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Abstract :
As a commonly used structure-based approach for virtual screening, molecular design and lead optimization, molecular docking can search the preferred orientation and conformation of a ligand for its optimal binding to a receptor or enzyme active site. In doing so, selecting an appropriate method to calculate the electrostatic potentials is critical. In the current report, nine different semi-empirical and empirical methods, including AM1, AM1-BCC, Del-Re, MMFF, Gasteiger, Hückel, Gasteiger–Hückel, Pullman and formal charges were investigated for their performance on the prediction of docking poses using the DOCK5.4 program. The results demonstrated that the AM1-BCC charges had the highest success rate.
Keywords :
molecular docking , DOCK , Electrostatic potentials , Scoring function , AM1-BCC
Journal title :
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Journal title :
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters