Author/Authors :
Bruno Dubois and members of the PréAL study، نويسنده , , Howard H Feldman، نويسنده , , Claudia Jacova، نويسنده , , Steven T. DeKosky، نويسنده , , Pascale Barberger-Gateau، نويسنده , , Jeffrey Cummings، نويسنده , , André Delacourte، نويسنده , , Douglas Galasko، نويسنده , , Serge Gauthier، نويسنده , , Gregory Jicha، نويسنده , , Kenichi Meguro، نويسنده , , John OʹBrien، نويسنده , , Florence Pasquier، نويسنده , , Philippe Robert، نويسنده , , Martin Rossor، نويسنده , , Steven Salloway، نويسنده , , Yaakov Stern، نويسنده , , Pieter Jelle Visser، نويسنده , , Philip Scheltens، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Summary
The NINCDS–ADRDA and the DSM-IV-TR criteria for Alzheimerʹs disease (AD) are the prevailing diagnostic standards in research; however, they have now fallen behind the unprecedented growth of scientific knowledge. Distinctive and reliable biomarkers of AD are now available through structural MRI, molecular neuroimaging with PET, and cerebrospinal fluid analyses. This progress provides the impetus for our proposal of revised diagnostic criteria for AD. Our framework was developed to capture both the earliest stages, before full-blown dementia, as well as the full spectrum of the illness. These new criteria are centred on a clinical core of early and significant episodic memory impairment. They stipulate that there must also be at least one or more abnormal biomarkers among structural neuroimaging with MRI, molecular neuroimaging with PET, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis of amyloid β or tau proteins. The timeliness of these criteria is highlighted by the many drugs in development that are directed at changing pathogenesis, particularly at the production and clearance of amyloid β as well as at the hyperphosphorylation state of tau. Validation studies in existing and prospective cohorts are needed to advance these criteria and optimise their sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.