Title of article :
Challenges Faced in Recruiting Patients from Primary Care Practices into a Physical Activity Intervention Trial ,
Author/Authors :
Susan MargitiC، نويسنده , , Mary Ann Sevick ScD، نويسنده , , Michael Miller، نويسنده , , Cheryl Albright، نويسنده , , Joyce Banton، نويسنده , , Kelley Callahan، نويسنده , , Melissa Garcia، نويسنده , , Larry Gibbons، نويسنده , , Benjamin J. Levine، نويسنده , , Roger Anderson، نويسنده , , Walter Ettinger، نويسنده , , Activity Counseling Trial Research Group، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Abstract :
Background. Special challenges are encountered when clinical trial recruitment targets a physician practice-based population, as opposed to recruiting from the community. Since most published information about recruitment has focused on the latter group, summation of successful primary-care-based recruitment strategies could prove useful for future trials recruiting from this population.
Methods. The Activity Counseling Trial (ACT) is a multicenter, randomized clinical trial that evaluated approaches to primary care-based interventions to increase physical activity in sedentary adults 35–75 years of age. Fifty-four clinicians from eight practices recruited 874 participants from three U.S. sites. Recruitment challenges that related, in great part, to the primary care setting included: (1) focusing on patients from ACT physician practices who had regularly scheduled or intend-to-schedule appointments within the next year; (2) placing trial staff in the clinical offices for recruitment purposes; and (3) placing trial interventionists in the physiciansʹ offices. Other challenges were related to recruitment of minorities and men.
Results. Patient mailing yielded 43.4% of all randomized participants, followed by office-based questionnaires (32.5%) and direct telephone contact (21.6%). Based on a retrospective cost-effective analysis (indirect costs excluded), the self-administered office-based questionnaire was the least costly strategy for one site ($14/randomized participant), followed by patient mailing at another site ($58). The direct telephone contact method utilized at one site serving primarily a minority population yielded a per randomized participant cost of $80.
Conclusions. Recruitment of clinical trial participants from practice-based populations requires modification of the strategies used to recruit from the community. Multiple strategies should be employed, followed closely for their respective yields, and adapted as needed.
Keywords :
Behavioral intervention , clinical trial , Clinical trial recruitment , Cost-effective analysis , General practice , recruitment. , primary care , Physical activity
Journal title :
Preventive Medicine
Journal title :
Preventive Medicine