Correlation between late potentials duration and QTc dispersion: Is there a causal relationship?

QTc interval dispersion (QTcd) analysis (difference between maximum and minimum QTc calculated from at least five of the standard 12 ECG leads) and signal-averaged electrocardiograms were performed on 23 patients referred to our coronary care unit because of acute myocardial infarction. Late potentials were considered positive if all three of the following criteria were satisfied: (1) total QRS duration (QRSd) > 114 ms; (2) duration of QRS under 40 μV (LAS 40) > 38 ms; (3) root mean square voltage of the last 40 ms of QRS (RMS 40) < 25 μV. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (group A, 9 patients) or absence of late potentials (group B, 14 patients). Group A patients showed a significantly higher QTcd (0.0652 ± 0.0177 s vs. 0.0448 ± 0.0201 s; P = 0.021) and a significantly longer mean QTcm (0.43117 ± 0.01817 s vs. 0.40472 ± 0.03013 s; P = 0.028) than group B patients. Among the three different parameters used to define the presence of late potentials, QTcd was significantly related to LAS 40 (r = 0.418, P = 0.047) and mean QTcm to QRSd (r = 0.497; P = 0.016). We also found a significant correlation between QTcd and mean QTcm (r = 0.426; P = 0.043). In conclusion, our data suggest that (1) the presence of late potentials is associated with a greater dishomogeneity of ventricular recovery time; (2) the longer the duration of late potentials, expressed by LAS 40, the greater the QTcd, suggesting that the dispersion of repolarization could be attributed to slowly conducting areas from which late potentials arise; (3) mean QTcm is not useful to identify these areas because it is more affected by total rather than by terminal QRS duration; (4) regional discrepancies of ventricular recovery time are connected with general repolarization duration.