Title of article :
Feasibility, safety, cost-effectiveness and 1 year follow-up of coronary stenting without predilation: a matched comparison with the standard approach
Author/Authors :
Fabrice Larrazet، نويسنده , , François Philippe، نويسنده , , Christophe Caussin، نويسنده , , Bernard Lancelin، نويسنده , , Eduardo Aptecar، نويسنده , , Jean-Marc Pernès، نويسنده , , François Laborde، نويسنده , , Alain Dibie MD، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Abstract :
Background: We evaluated the feasibility, safety, procedural cost-effectiveness, radiation dose and time and 1-year target vessel revascularization rate of direct unprotected mounted stenting without previous balloon dilatation (DS) in native coronary artery lesions. Methods: DS was attempted in 119 patients; 39 had a recent myocardial infarction, 62 had unstable angina, and 18 had stable angina. The clinical follow-up was obtained at 14±5 months (range 6 to 24 months). These results were compared with those for a consecutive group of 160 patients matched for type and length of lesions and who had a stent only if the post-balloon residual stenosis was >30%. Results: The feasibility of DS was 112/119 (94%). The number of inflations, the length of the stent/length of the lesion ratio, the time and the dose of radiation were dramatically lower in the DS group (P<0.001). DS conferred a slight reduction in procedure-related cost [$820±157 for DS vs. 894±427 for standard dilatation (SD) per patient]. The 1-year target vessel revascularization rate was similar in both groups [nine (8%) for DS vs. 17 (11%) patients for SD, ns]. Conclusions: DS is feasible and safe in selected coronary lesions. This method provides a low rate of repeat revascularization and reduces the time and the dose of radiation compared with the standard approach.
Keywords :
Coronary stenting , Predilation
Journal title :
International Journal of Cardiology
Journal title :
International Journal of Cardiology