Title of article
Myocardial perfusion in real-time using power modulation: In vivo evidence for microcirculatory damage after acute myocardial infarction
Author/Authors
Raul Moreno، نويسنده , , José Luis Zamorano، نويسنده , , Viviana Serra، نويسنده , , Carlos Almer?a، نويسنده , , Jose-Luis Rodrigo، نويسنده , , Dionisio Herrera، نويسنده , , Leopoldo Perez de Isla، نويسنده , , Luis Mataix and NASPEAF Investigators، نويسنده , , Adalia Aubele، نويسنده , , Esther De Marco، نويسنده , , Luis Sanchez-Harguindey، نويسنده , , Carlos Macaya، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Pages
5
From page
187
To page
191
Abstract
Background and objectives: In addition to the myocardium, the microvasculature may be also damaged in acute myocardial infarction. The aim was to evaluate the capability of myocardial contrast echocardiography in the detection of microvasculature damage after myocardial infarction. Patients and methods: Twelve patients with recent acute myocardial infarction and five control subjects with normal coronary arteries and without history of myocardial infarction were studied. Myocardial contrast echocardiography with power modulation was performed, and quantitative data were measured off-line. Power modulation uses a combination of low (0.1) and high (1.7) mechanical indexes, allowing a real-time evaluation of myocardial perfusion. Contrast agent was administered as a 3-min bolus. The quantitative analysis was performed off-line by a different blinded investigator. The refilling velocity was calculated as the difference between the peak myocardial refilling value and the value at 1 s after the impulse divided by the time from the first second after the impulse to the peak refilling value. Results: Eighty-one myocardial segments (75%) were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively in AMI patients, and 18 (60%) in control subjects (P=NS). The peak refilling intensity was not significantly different in patients and control subjects (6.62±5.85 vs. 7.53±4.06 dB, respectively). However, time to peak refilling intensity was significantly longer (5.25±1.57 vs. 4.00±0.53, P=0.004) and the velocity of refilling was significantly lower (2.74±5.34 vs. 6.58±8.02, P=0.028) in patients with myocardial infarction. Conclusion: There is microvasculature damage after myocardial infarction that is reflected as a delayed velocity of refilling in myocardial contrast echocardiography.
Keywords
myocardial contrast echocardiography , Acute myocardial infarction , microcirculation
Journal title
International Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year
2003
Journal title
International Journal of Cardiology
Record number
814030
Link To Document