Comparison of dual-chamber pacing with nonsurgical septal reduction effect in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the influence of dual-chamber pacing vs. nonsurgical septal reduction on hemodynamic and morphological parameters in patients with obstructive form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Methods: Nineteen patients with dual-chamber pacing (group I) and 9 patients who underwent nonsurgical septal reduction (group II) were studied at baseline and after a 6-month follow-up. The changes of left ventricular outflow tract gradient and posterior wall thickness (as an index of left ventricular hypertrophy regression) were compared. Results: The baseline left ventricular outflow tract gradient was comparable between group I and group II (77±25 vs. 82±25 mm Hg, p>0.05). At 6-month follow-up, the left ventricular outflow tract gradient was reduced to a similar level in both groups (28±19 vs. 25±12 mm Hg, p>0.05). At baseline, posterior wall hypertrophy was comparable between groups (12.9±1.7 vs. 13.6±2.2 mm, p>0.05). During follow-up, the posterior wall thickness was unchanged in the pacing group (12.9±1.7 vs. 12.6±1.6 mm, p>0.05), whereas nonsurgical septal reduction induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in myocardial region remote from the infarcted septal segment (13.6±2.2 vs. 10.5±2.3 mm, p<0.003). Conclusion: Despite comparable reduction of instantaneous left ventricular outflow tract gradient, the nonsurgical septal reduction decreased posterior wall thickness, whereas pacing did not reduce left ventricular hypertrophy. Thus, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy that appeared solely after nonsurgical septal reduction may reflect the more permanent reduction of left ventricular pressure overload. Thus, not only hemodynamic but also morphological benefit from nonsurgical septal reduction seems to indicate the superiority of this method over dual-chamber pacing.