Title of article :
Children’s Feedback Preferences in Response
to an Experimentally Manipulated Peer Evaluation
Outcome: The Role of Depressive Symptoms
Author/Authors :
Albert Reijntjes، نويسنده , , Maja Dekovic، نويسنده , , Marjolijn Vermande ·
Michael J. Telch، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
دوماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2007
Abstract :
The present study examined the linkage between
pre-adolescent children’s depressive symptoms and their
preferences for receiving positive vs. negative feedback subsequent
to being faced with an experimentally manipulated
peer evaluation outcome in real time. Participants (n = 142)
ages 10 to 13, played a computer contest based on the television
show Survivor and were randomized to either a peer
rejection (i.e., receiving the lowest total ‘likeability’ score
from a group of peer-judges), a peer success (i.e., receiving
the highest score), or a control peer evaluation condition.
Children’s self-reported feedback preferences were
then assessed. Results revealed that participants assigned to
the negative evaluation outcome, relative to either the success
or the control outcome, showed a significantly higher
subsequent preference for negatively tuned feedback. Contrary
to previous work and predictions derived from selfverification
theory, children higher in depressive symptoms
were only more likely to prefer negative feedback in response
to the negative peer evaluation outcome. These effects
for depression were not accounted for by either state
mood at baseline ormood change in response to the feedback
manipulation.
Keywords :
Peers . Feedback preferences . Pre-adolescentchildren . Depressive symptoms . Sociometric status
Journal title :
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Journal title :
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology