Author/Authors :
Randy P. Auerbach، نويسنده , , Nicole K. Eberhart &
John R. Z. Abela، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
The goal of the current study was to compare
diathesis-stress and transactional models of cognitive
vulnerability to depression in samples of Canadian
(n=118) and Chinese (n=405) adolescents. We utilized a
six-month multi-wave, longitudinal design in order to
examine whether (a) perceived control moderated the
association between the occurrence of dependent interpersonal
stressors and subsequent increases in depressive
symptoms (i.e., a diathesis-stress perspective) and (b)
dependent interpersonal stressors mediated the association
between perceived control and subsequent increases in
depressive symptoms (i.e., a transactional perspective).
Results from idiographic, time-lagged, hierarchical linear
modeling analyses indicated that for Canadian adolescents
both diathesis-stress and transactional models were significant
predictors of depressive symptomology. When
examining the diathesis-stress model, boys, but not girls,
who reported lower perceived control, reported higher
levels of depressive symptoms following the occurrence
of dependent interpersonal stress. Gender differences,
however, were not present in the transactional model. In
contrast, transactional, but not diathesis-stress, models
were significant in Chinese adolescents, and gender
differences did not emerge. Overall, these results may
reflect culturally-relevant differences in the etiology of
depression in Canadian and Chinese adolescents.