Author/Authors :
Sylvie Mrug، نويسنده , , Brooke S. G. Molina، نويسنده , , Betsy Hoza &
Alyson C. Gerdes، نويسنده , , Stephen P. Hinshaw &
Lily Hechtman، نويسنده , , L. Eugene Arnold، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Even after evidence-based treatment, Attention-
Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is associated with
poor long-term outcomes. These outcomes may be partly
explained by difficulties in peer functioning, which are common
among children with ADHD and which do not respond
optimally to standard ADHD treatments. We examined
whether peer rejection and lack of dyadic friendships experienced
by children with ADHD after treatment contribute to
long-term emotional and behavioral problems and global
impairment, and whether having a reciprocal friend buffers
the negative effects of peer rejection. Children with Combined
type ADHD (N0300) enrolled in the Multimodal Treatment
Study of Children with ADHD (MTA) were followed for
8 years. Peer rejection and dyadic friendships were measured
with sociometric assessments after the active treatment period
(14 or 24 months after baseline; M ages 9.7 and 10.5 years,
respectively). Outcomes included delinquency, depression,
anxiety, substance use, and general impairment at 6 and 8 years
after baseline (Mean ages 14.9 and 16.8 years, respectively).
With inclusion of key covariates, including demographics,
symptoms ofADHD, ODD, and CD, and level of the outcome
variable at 24 months, peer rejection predicted cigarette smoking,
delinquency, anxiety, and global impairment at 6 years
and global impairment at 8 years after baseline. Having a
reciprocal friend was not, however, uniquely predictive of
any outcomes and did not reduce the negative effects of peer
rejection. Evaluating and addressing peer rejection in treatment
planning may be necessary to improve long-term outcomes
in children with ADHD.