Title of article
Estimating the ability of birds to sustain additional human-caused mortalities using a simple decision rule and allometric relationships Original Research Article
Author/Authors
Peter W. Dillingham، نويسنده , , DAVID FLETCHER، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages
10
From page
1783
To page
1792
Abstract
Many bird species are subject to human-caused mortality, either through direct harvest (e.g. game birds) or through incidental mortalities (e.g. fisheries-related bycatch of seabirds, impact with vehicles, wind turbines, or power lines). In order to assess the impact of additional mortalities on birds, both the number of birds killed and their ability to sustain those deaths must be estimated. Niel and Lebreton [Niel, C., Lebreton, J.-D., 2005. Using demographic invariants to detect overharvested bird populations from incomplete data. Conservation Biology 19, 826–835] applied a simple decision rule [Wade, P.R., 1998. Calculating limits to the allowable human-caused mortality of cetaceans and pinnipeds. Marine Mammal Science 14, 1–37] to estimate the level of additional human-caused mortality or potential biological removal (PBR) that can be sustained for bird species given only (1) estimates of the population size, adult survival, and age at first breeding, and (2) the current population status and management goals. We provide guidelines for appropriate use of the method and case studies comparing results from this method to other approaches. Particular focus is placed on applying the method to Procellariiformes.
Keywords
Bycatch , magpie goose , Snow goose , Population growth , White-chinned petrel , Procellariiformes
Journal title
Biological Conservation
Serial Year
2008
Journal title
Biological Conservation
Record number
838226
Link To Document