• Title of article

    Estimating the ability of birds to sustain additional human-caused mortalities using a simple decision rule and allometric relationships Original Research Article

  • Author/Authors

    Peter W. Dillingham، نويسنده , , DAVID FLETCHER، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    1783
  • To page
    1792
  • Abstract
    Many bird species are subject to human-caused mortality, either through direct harvest (e.g. game birds) or through incidental mortalities (e.g. fisheries-related bycatch of seabirds, impact with vehicles, wind turbines, or power lines). In order to assess the impact of additional mortalities on birds, both the number of birds killed and their ability to sustain those deaths must be estimated. Niel and Lebreton [Niel, C., Lebreton, J.-D., 2005. Using demographic invariants to detect overharvested bird populations from incomplete data. Conservation Biology 19, 826–835] applied a simple decision rule [Wade, P.R., 1998. Calculating limits to the allowable human-caused mortality of cetaceans and pinnipeds. Marine Mammal Science 14, 1–37] to estimate the level of additional human-caused mortality or potential biological removal (PBR) that can be sustained for bird species given only (1) estimates of the population size, adult survival, and age at first breeding, and (2) the current population status and management goals. We provide guidelines for appropriate use of the method and case studies comparing results from this method to other approaches. Particular focus is placed on applying the method to Procellariiformes.
  • Keywords
    Bycatch , magpie goose , Snow goose , Population growth , White-chinned petrel , Procellariiformes
  • Journal title
    Biological Conservation
  • Serial Year
    2008
  • Journal title
    Biological Conservation
  • Record number

    838226