Author/Authors :
Qing Li، نويسنده , , Bruce Clark and Ian Winchester، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Although traditional instructional design and technology (IDT) has largely
been based on objectivism, in the past 20 years, constructivism has emerged as
a dominant framework for IDT. Both perspectives, however, present shortcomings.
This paper explores enactivism—an emerging new philosophical world
view—as an alternative paradigm. It also investigates the possibilities offered
by this new paradigm to IDT. The philosophical world view known as enactivism
is reviewed to illustrate the similarities and differences among the three
philosophical paradigms, namely, objectivism, constructivism and enactivism.
Finally, details of enactivism and its implications for IDT are explored