Title of article :
Web Citation Data for Impact Assessment: A Comparison
of Four Science Disciplines
Author/Authors :
Liwen Vaughan، نويسنده , , Debora Shaw، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Abstract :
The number and type of Web citations to journal articles
in four areas of science are examined: biology, genetics,
medicine, and multidisciplinary sciences. For a sample
of 5,972 articles published in 114 journals, the median
Web citation counts per journal article range from 6.2 in
medicine to 10.4 in genetics. About 30% of Web citations
in each area indicate intellectual impact (citations from
articles or class readings, in contrast to citations from
bibliographic services or the author’s or journal’s home
page). Journals receiving more Web citations also have
higher percentages of citations indicating intellectual
impact. There is significant correlation between the
number of citations reported in the databases from the
Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, now Thomson
Scientific) and the number of citations retrieved using
the Google search engine (Web citations). The correlation
is much weaker for journals published outside the
United Kingdom or United States and for multidisciplinary
journals. Web citation numbers are higher than ISI
citation counts, suggesting that Web searches might be
conducted for an earlier or a more fine-grained assessment
of an article’s impact. The Web-evident impact of
non-UK/USA publications might provide a balance to the
geographic or cultural biases observed in ISI’s data, although
the stability of Web citation counts is debatable
Journal title :
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Journal title :
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology