Author/Authors :
Anu MacIntosh-Murray، نويسنده , , Chun Wei Choo، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Although it is assumed that information about patient
safety and adverse events will be used for improvement
and organizational learning, we know little about how this
actually happens in patient care settings. This study examines
how organizational and professional practices
and beliefs related to patient safety influence (1) how
health care providers and managers make sense of patient
safety risks and adverse events, and (2) the flow and
use of information for making improvements. The research
is based on an ethnographic case study of a medical
unit in a large tertiary care hospital in Canada. The
study found that front-line staff are task driven, coping
with heavy workloads that limit their attention to and
recognition of potential information needs and knowledge
gaps. However, a surrogate in an informationrelated
role—an “information/change agent”—may intervene
successfully with staff and engage in preventive
maintenance and repair of routines. The article discusses
four key functions of the information/change agent (i.e.,
boundary spanner, information seeker, knowledge translator,
and change champion) in the context of situated
practice and learning. All four functions are important for
facilitating changes to practice, routines, and the work
environment to improve patient safety.