Abstract :
This paper explains why relative PPP should hold more tightly in emerging markets, and
why pricing to market would be observed more frequently in the OECD countries. It studies
the endogenous determination of pricing to market, in a real option model with timedependent
transportation costs, where the future terms of trade are random. Allowing timedependent
transportation costs adds a dimension of investment to the pre-buying of imports,
implying that financial considerations determine the frequency of pricing to market, and the
deviations from relative PPP. If the expected discounted cost of last minute delivery is higher
than pre-buying, one exercises the option of spot market imports if the realized terms of trade
are favorable enough. Pricing to market is observed in countries characterized by low terms of
trade volatility and low financing costs. In these circumstances, imports are pre-bought, and
the spot market for imports is inactive. In countries where the financing costs and the terms of
trade volatility are high, few imports are pre-bought, the price of imports is determined by the
realized real exchange rate, and a version of relative PPP holds. With an intermediate level of
terms of trade volatility and of financing costs, a mixed regime is observed. If the realized real
exchange rate is weak, pricing to market would prevail, increasing consumers’ welfare by
shielding them from the adverse purchasing power consequences of weakterms of trade. If the
realized real exchange rate is favorable enough, more imports are purchased in the spot
market, and the relative PPP would hold. Higher financing costs increase the cost of pre-buying imports, reducing thereby the frequency of pricing to market, increasing the expected
relative price of imports, reducing the expected deviations from relative PPP, and reducing
welfare.
Keywords :
Pricing to market , Trade credits , Time-dependent transportation costs , Volatility , RelativePPP