Author/Authors :
S.D. Kharche?، نويسنده , , G. Taru Sharma، نويسنده , , A.C. Majumdar، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Oocytes were aspirated from goat ovaries, washed in TCM-199 containing 10% estrus goat serum (EGS) and subjected to
different variables of vitrification viz. exposure to propanediol before maturation of oocytes but without freezing, to detect
the level of damage attributed to propanediol alone. The removal of cumulus cells to mimic damage attributed to osmotic
stress during cryoprotectant exposure or vitrification procedures and vitrification with propanediol (40%, w/v) and trehelose
(0.25 mol l−1) in PBS supplemented with 4% (w/v) BSA. The oocytes (n = 432) after treatment with different variables of
vitrification were thawed and cultured for 27 h in TCM-199 with 0.5 g/ml FSH, 100 IU/ml LH, 1 g/ml E2 and 10% EGS
over a granulose cell monolayer. After 27 h of culture the matured oocytes were separated from the cumulus cells by treating
them with PBS containing 0.1% hyaluronidase and by passing them through a fine pipette, fixed in acetic alcohol, stained
with aceto orcein and observed under a phase contrast microscope for evidence of maturation. Similarly, oocytes (n = 184)
following treatment of different variables of vitrification were thawed, matured and fertilized in a TALP medium. After 18 h
of co-incubation with spermatozoa, oocytes were denuded, fixed in acetic alcohol, stained with aceto orcein and observed
under phase contrast for evidence of fertilization. Maturation and fertilization rates were 27.5, 58.8, 46.8 and 74.1% and 17.8,
28.0, 40.0 and 54.4% for vitrified, exposed, denuded and control oocytes, respectively. These results indicate vitrification to
be detrimental for in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization of goat oocytes.
© 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Keywords :
goat , oocyte , vitrification , propanediol , IVM