Abstract :
The aim of this work was to compare batch and continuous hydrolysis of ovine whey proteins
in a membrane reactor and to evaluate influence of thermocalcic precipitation before
hydrolysis. Reconstituted dried ovine whey fromlump cheese production (a traditional Slovak
cheese) was used as a substrate for hydrolysis by Promod 439L protease from Bacillus
licheniformis. Initial substrate had 2% proteins andpH8.5. Hydrolysiswas performed directly
(i) or after a pre-treatment (ii) comprising thermocalcic precipitation at 50 ◦C followed by
microfiltration at 40 ◦C, batch-wise or in a membrane ultrafiltration (UF) reactor equipped
with 8 kDa ceramic membrane. Mean residence time of 60 min was maintained after batch
pre-hydrolysis of the substrate in the first 60 min period, during which the permeate was
recirculated. During the subsequent UF, the reaction volumewas kept constant by a continuous
feeding of the substrate. After the pre-treatment (ii), crude protein decreased by 25%.
Degree of hydrolysis was 9.2% (i) and 8.8% (ii) after 60 min at stand-alone batch hydrolysis,
and 10.0% (i) and 9.0% (ii) after 60 min at batch-like pre-hydrolysis in the membrane reactor.
After 180 min, the degree of hydrolysis (DH) in the UF permeatewas 15.2% (i) and 13.0% (ii);
the nitrogen contentwas comparable for (i) and (ii). Without the pre-treatment, (i) required
three times higher pressure (0.3MPa) in comparison with than (ii) to maintain residence
time. The batch hydrolysis treatment resulted in 11.9% (i) and 14.6% (ii) DH after 180 min.
At least 50% of enzyme can be saved using the membrane reactor in comparison with batch
hydrolysis and the product does not contain enzyme and unhydrolyzed proteins