Abstract :
This study examined the effects of dam size and plane of nutrition during pregnancy on
dam udder size, lamb colostrum intake, and lamb liveweight gain (LWG). The study also
attempted to quantify the effects of a number of dam and offspring parameters on lamb
LWG. Two hundred and fifty-five heavy (H) (60.8±0.18 kg) and 255 light (L) (42.5±0.17 kg)
Romney dams were allocated to ad libitum (A) or maintenance (M) nutritional regimens,
underNewZealand pastoral grazing conditions – from day 21 to day 140 post-insemination.
One week prior to lambing, all dams and offspring were managed as one group and provided
with ad libitum feeding. Udder dimensions were measured at day 140 of pregnancy in a subgroup
of 313 dams. Lambs were weighed within 24 h of birth (L0) and at L21, L45, L80 and
L100 and the lamb liveweight gains calculated. From a sub-group of 167 lambs, blood was
sampled at 24–36 h of age to determine the glucose and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT)
concentrations. During pregnancy, the M-dams gained less live weight than the A-dams and
gave birth to lighter lambs – which resulted in a reduced LWG, until L21. From L21 onwards,
the LWG of the lambs born to M-dams did not differ from lambs born to A-dams. Udders of
the LA-dams were bigger than those of LM-dams. Lambs born to A-dams recorded a higher
blood glucose concentration than lambs born to M-dams. Dam size and nutrition did not
affect the GGT concentrations of the lamb. Heavy (H) dams remained heavier than the Ldams
throughout pregnancy and gave birth to heavier lambs, than the L-dams. Lambs born
to H-dams recorded greater LWG than lambs born to L-dams during early, mid and late
lactation. Modelling of the results showed that only a small part of the variation (±35%) of
LWGof the lambs could be explained by the measured variables (e.g., birth weight, dam live
weight, sire, udder dimension, nutrition). The largest single variable explained less than 5%
of the variation in LWG. In conclusion, this study showed that lamb liveweight gain in early
lactation is affected by both dam size and plane of nutrition and could likely be explained
by differences in the lactational performance of the ewes. Interestingly, modelling of the
results showed that a considerable proportion of lamb liveweight gain was not explained
by the variables measured.