Author/Authors :
M. Eugenia Mosca Torres?، نويسنده , , Silvia Puig، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Habitat use and selection by vicu˜nas and particularly by individuals of different social categories
were evaluated during the summer and winter of two years (2006 and 2007) that
differed in their precipitation pattern. Both, use and selection, were analyzed within the
framework of the optimal foraging theory (OFT) that predicts a high proportion of individuals
using habitats where the most nutritional food items are present, and if other things
are equal, habitats should be chosen if they yield the highest average rate of energy intake,
which fits with this theory. Indeed, a prediction of the habitat selection theory (HST) was
evaluated during winter (dry season). Over the study period high proportions of vicu˜nas
occupied habitats with availability of high quality food, which supports the OFT. However,
habitat selection differed between seasons and years due to the decrease in plant resource
availability in the winter of both years and in the summer of 2007 (with drought conditions).
In the dry season of the good year (2006), vicu˜nas (familial individuals, particularly)
were more homogeneously distributed among habitats than in summer, which is consistent
with the HST. High proportions of individuals at the wetland (called vega) were more evident
during the bad year (2007) than in the good one. Therefore, habitat use (and selection)
by vicu˜nas in this sector of the Puna region is influenced by the availability of high quality
food resources and by the presence of water, and the relevance of the latter increased
with drought conditions. An assessment of the interactions between individuals of different
social categories will contribute to better understanding the distribution of animals among
different habitats.