Title of article :
The detection of psychological problems by General Practitioners
Author/Authors :
S.Maginn، نويسنده , , A. P. Boardman، نويسنده , , T. K. J. Craig، نويسنده , , M.Haddad، نويسنده , , G.Heath، نويسنده , , J. Stott، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Abstract :
Background Common mental illness in
Black Africans and Black Caribbeans has been relatively
little studied in the UK.Previous studies of the detection
of psychological problems by General Practitioners
(GPs) in these groups have been inconclusive. Aims The
aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence,detection
and management of psychological problems in General
Practice among Black Caribbeans and Black
Africans compared to White English attenders and to examine
the relative contribution of other sociodemographic
factors to these main outcome variables.Method
Consecutive attenders aged 16–65 years at 18 General
Practitioners in South-East London completed the General
Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) before seeing the
GP. The GPs rated the current emotional state of the patients
at the end of each consultation.Comparison of the
GHQ and GP ratings was used to compute the detection
indices. Results A total of 1211 patients aged 16–65 years
were approached to take part in the study.Of the patients,
75 (6 %) declined or were not able to complete the
GHQ.In all, 994 individuals had both GP and GHQ ratings.
There was an overall probable prevalence of 37%,of
which 73% were identified as cases by the GPs. Black
African patients had lower rates of common mental disorders,
were less likely to be detected as psychiatric cases
by the GP and less likely to receive active management for
their psychological problems than Black Caribbean and
White English patients. Rates of prevalence, detection
and management were similar between Black Caribbean
and White English patients. In the multivariate analysis,
ethnicity,employment and age all played a significant independent
role in predicting probable prevalence. The
patients’ reported decision to talk to their GP about psychological
problems was the main predictor of detection.
Ethnicity did not independently predict detection, but
Black African cases were less likely to say that they would
talk to their GP about psychological problems.GPs’identification
indices mirrored probable prevalence,suggesting
that GPs were more sensitive to detecting psychiatric
illness in individuals belonging to groups which commonly
presented as symptomatic. Conclusions The findings
suggest that in General Practice the prevalence of
common mental disorders, their detection and management
in Black Caribbeans are similar to those in White
English, but that Black Africans have lower prevalence,
are less likely to be detected and are less likely to receive
active management. The study of GP consulters presents
problems for the interpretation of these results and it
may be that Black Africans with psychological problems
are less likely than their Caribbean and English counterparts
to attend their GP,and less willing to speak to them
about these problems when they do.Future similar studies
should distinguish Black African and Black
Caribbean subjects in their analyses,as categories such as
‘Afro-Caribbean’may mask important differences in attitudes
and illness behaviour.
Keywords :
psychiatric disorder – detection –prevalence – general practice – ethnic groups
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)