Title of article :
Intensive case management for severe psychotic illness:
is there a general benefit for patients with complex needs?
Author/Authors :
Chris Metcalfe، نويسنده , , Ian R. White، نويسنده , , Tim Weaver، نويسنده , , Obioha C. Ukoumunne، نويسنده , , Kate Harvey، نويسنده , , Theresa Tattan .
Simon G. Thompson، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Abstract :
The UK700 trial failed to demonstrate an
overall benefit of intensive case management (ICM) in
patients with severe psychotic illness. This does not
discount a benefit for particular subgroups, and evidence
of a benefit of ICM for patients of borderline
intelligence has been presented. The aim of this study is
to investigate whether this effect is part of a general
benefit for patients with severe psychosis complicated
by additional needs. In the UK700 trial patients with
severe psychosis were randomly allocated to ICM or
standard case management. For each patient group with
complex needs the effect of ICM is compared with that
in the rest of the study cohort. Outcome measures are
days spent in psychiatric hospital and the admission
and discharge rates. ICM may be of benefit to patients
with severe psychosis complicated by borderline intelligence
or depression, but may cause patients using
illicit drugs to spend more time in hospital. There was
no convincing evidence of an effect of ICM in a further
seven patient groups. ICM is not of general benefit to
patients with severe psychosis complicated by additional
needs. The benefit of ICM for patients with borderline
intelligence is an isolated effect which should be
interpreted cautiously until further data are available.
Keywords :
case management – co-morbidity – datainterpretation – statistical – hospitalisation – psychoticdisorders – randomised controlled trials
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)