Title of article :
Individual unmet needs for care: are they sensitive as outcome
criterion for the effectiveness of mental health services
interventions
Author/Authors :
Durk Wiersma، نويسنده , , Rob van den Brink، نويسنده , , Kerstin Wolters، نويسنده , , Rosemarie McCabe، نويسنده , , Jens Bullenkamp ?
Lars Hansson، نويسنده , , Christoph Lauber، نويسنده , , Rafael Martinez-Leal، نويسنده , , Wulf Ro¨ssler، نويسنده , , Hans Salize ?
Tommy Bjo¨rkman، نويسنده , , Francisco Torres-Gonzales، نويسنده , , Donna J. Wright، نويسنده , , Stefan Priebe، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
Background Mental health interventions
should demonstrate an effect on patients’ functioning
as well as his/her needs, in particular on unmet needs
whose assessment depends on the perspective of either
the patient or the clinician. However, individual
met and unmet needs appear to change over time,
qualitatively and quantitatively, raising questions
about their sensitivity to change and about the association
between level of needs and treatment. Methods
Data on baseline and follow-up need assessment
in community mental health services in four European
countries in the context of a cluster randomised
trial on a novel mental health service intervention
were used, which involved 102 clinicians with key
worker roles and 320 patients with schizophrenia or
related psychotic disorders. Need assessment was
performed with the Camberwell assessment of needs
short appraisal schedule (CANSAS) among patients as
well as clinicians. Focus is the sensitivity to change in
unmet needs over time as well as the concordance
between patient and clinician ratings and their relationship
with treatment condition. Results At followup
294 patients (92%) had a full need assessment,
while clinician rated needs were available for 302
patients (94%). Generally, the total number of met
needs remained quite stable, but unmet needs decreased
significantly over time, according to patients
as well as to clinicians. Sensitivity to change of unmet
needs is quite high: about two third of all unmet needs
made a transition to no or met need, and more than
half of all unmet needs at follow-up were new.
Agreement between patient and clinician on unmet
needs at baseline as well as follow-up was rather low,
without any indication of a specific treatment effect.
Conclusions Individual unmet needs appear to be
quite sensitive to change over time but as yet less
suitable as outcome criterion of treatment or specific
interventions.
Keywords :
need for care – schizophrenia –routine outcome assessment – community mentalhealth care
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)