Title of article :
Gender specificity in the prediction of clinically diagnosed
depression
Author/Authors :
Isabelle Godin، نويسنده , , Marcel Kornitzer، نويسنده , , Nicolas Clumeck، نويسنده , , Paul Linkowski، نويسنده , , Filomena Valente، نويسنده , , France Kittel، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
Background The recent increase in the
incidence of clinical depression represents a major
public health and socio-economical burden. Depression
has its roots in both professional and private
domains but few epidemiological studies have looked
at predictors of long term clinical depression as defined
by a sick-leave of 28 days or more and a diagnosis
by a general practitioner in both genders.
Objectives To study baseline predictors of long term
spells of clinical depression within the framework of a
large prospective study, the Belstress Study, in 6,659
men and 2,737 women aged 35–59 years at baseline
survey. Methods Kaplan–Meyer survival curves and
Cox regression models were used in order to relate
long term clinical depression defined by a sick-leave
of 28 days or more to baseline socio-demographic
and work and non-work variables. Results and conclusions
Density incidence of long term clinical
depression is 0.5 years and 1.1/1,000 persons/months
for men and women respectively. In univariate analyses
specific gender predictors were observed as for
men predictors besides level of education, were work
related: high job-strain OR 1.67 (CI 95% 1.03; 2.71)
and work dissatisfaction OR 1.78 (CI 95% 1.09; 2.91)
whereas for women baseline predictors are related to
private life dissatisfaction OR 1.84 (CI 95% 1.16; 2.91)
and to a lesser degree low social support from coworkers
OR 1.50 (CI 95% 0.93; 2.40). In both genders
baseline severe depression symptoms defined by a
CES-D score of percentile 90 or above is a predictor of
long term sick-leave for clinical depression. In multivariate
analyses, in a model without baseline CES-D
high job-strain and job dissatisfaction remain independent
predictors for incident clinical depression in
men whereas only private life dissatisfaction remains
a significant predictor in women. When added to the
model CES-D is the most powerful predictor of clinical
depression in both genders. Together with level of
education, work dissatisfaction remains borderline
significant in men whereas private life dissatisfaction
remains an independent predictor for clinical
depression in women. In men baseline symptoms of
depression alleviate the impact of high job-strain on
incident clinical depression whereas in women, private
life dissatisfaction remains an independent predictor
of clinical depression
Keywords :
working and living conditions – sickleave – depression – gender – psychosocial environment
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)
Journal title :
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (SPPE)