Author/Authors :
Maria J. Maynard، نويسنده , , Seeromanie Harding، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background In Britain and elsewhere there is ethnic
variation in mental health in adulthood but less is known
about adolescence. Few studies examining the role of
family life in adolescent mental well-being have been
based on a multi-ethnic UK sample. We explored whether
family activities explain ethnic differences in mental health
among adolescents in London, UK.
Method These analyses are based on 4,349 Black Caribbean,
Black African, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi and
White UK boys and girls aged 11–13, in 51 schools. Psychological
well-being was measured as the total difficulties
score from Goodman’s strengths and difficulties questionnaire
(increasing score represents increasing difficulties).
Results Participation in family activities varied by ethnicity.
Compared with the White UK group, all minority
groups were more likely to visit friends and relatives and
go other places as a family. Black Caribbeans and Nigerian/
Ghanaians were less likely and South Asian groups
more likely to eat a meal together as a family. In multivariate
analyses all minority groups had better well-being
scores compared to Whites, independent of family type and
socio-economic status (SES). Although adjusting for family
activities slightly attenuated the association for South
Asians, the minority ethnic advantage in psychological
well-being remained [regression coefficients for Black
Caribbeans = -0.66 (95% CI = -1.13, -0.20); Nigerian/
Ghanaians = -1.27 (-1.81, -0.74); Other Africans =
-1.43 (-2.00, -0.86); Indians = -1.15 (-1.73, -0.58);
Pakistani/Bangladeshis = -0.66 (-1.20, -0.12)]. In
analyses based on the whole group, all activity variables
were independent correlates of psychological well-being.
Multivariate models, stratified by ethnicity, showed that
Bweekly compared to daily family meals was associated
with poorer mental health for all groups, except Black
Caribbeans, independent of family type and SES.
Conclusion Despite ethnic patterning of the frequency of
family activities, adjusting for differences in these variables
did not account for the better psychological wellbeing
of minorities. Family activities were, however,
important independent correlates of psychological wellbeing
for all groups in this sample