Author/Authors :
Penelope Turton، نويسنده , , Alexia Demetriou، نويسنده , , William Boland، نويسنده , , Stephen Gillard، نويسنده , ,
Michael Kavuma، نويسنده , , Gillian Mezey، نويسنده , , Victoria Mountford، نويسنده , , Kati Turner، نويسنده , , Sarah White، نويسنده , , Ewa Zadeh، نويسنده , , CHRISTINE WRIGHT، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Introduction The ‘recovery approach’ to the management
of severe mental health problems has become a guiding
vision of service provision amongst many practitioners,
researchers, and policy makers as well as service users.
Method This qualitative pilot study explored the meaning
of ‘recovery’ with users of three specialist mental health
services (eating disorders, dual diagnosis, and forensic) in
18 semi-structured interviews.
Results The relevance of themes identified in mainstream
recovery literature was confirmed; however, the interpretation
and relative weight of these themes appeared to be
affected by factors that were specific to the diagnosis and
treatment context. ‘Clinical’ recovery themes were also
seen as important, as were aspects of care that reflect core
human values, such as kindness
