Author/Authors :
Ingo Scha¨fer، نويسنده , , Tom Burns، نويسنده , , W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker، نويسنده , , Silvana Galderisi، نويسنده , , Janusz K. Rybakowski، نويسنده , , Jan Libiger، نويسنده , , Wulf Ro¨ssler، نويسنده , , Andrew Molodynski، نويسنده , , Monika Edlinger، نويسنده , , Giuseppe Piegari، نويسنده , , Jela Hrnc?iarova، نويسنده , ,
Krystyna Gorna، نويسنده , , Matthias Jaeger، نويسنده , , Anne-Kathrin Fett، نويسنده , , Johanna Hissbach، نويسنده , , Dieter Naber، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background Relatively few studies have examined how
patients with schizophrenia and depression view psychiatric
research and what influences their readiness to participate.
Methods A total of 763 patients (48% schizophrenia,
52% depression) from 7 European countries were examined
using a specifically designed self-report questionnaire
[‘‘Hamburg Attitudes to Psychiatric Research Questionnaire’’
(HAPRQ)].
Results Most patients (98%) approved of psychiatric
research, in general, at least ‘‘a little’’. There was a tendency
to approve psychosocial rather than biological
research topics (e.g. research on the role of the family by
91% of patients compared to 79% in genetics). Reasons to
participate were mainly altruistic. Only a minority (28%)
considered monetary incentives important. Patients wanted
extensive background information and a feedback of the
results; both were significantly more expressed by schizophrenia
as compared to depressive patients, although these
findings need to be interpreted with care because of age and
gender differences between the diagnostic groups.
Conclusion While patients expressed discerning views of
psychiatric research, only few differences were apparent
between the two diagnostic groups. Patients’ researchpriorities are not the same as those of many professionals
and funding bodies. Their demonstrated critical appraisal
should inform future research ensuring an increased patient
role in the research process