Author/Authors :
Richard Van Dorn، نويسنده , , Jan Volavka، نويسنده , , Norman Johnson، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Purpose A general consensus exists that severe mental
illness (SMI) increases violence risk. However, a recent
report claimed that SMI ‘‘alone was not statistically related
to future violence in bivariate or multivariate analyses.’’
We reanalyze the data used to make this claim with a focus
on causal relationships between SMI and violence, rather
than the statistical prediction of violence.
Methods Data are from the National Epidemiologic Survey
on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a twowave
study (N = 34,653: Wave 1: 2001–2003; Wave 2:
2004–2005). Indicators of mental disorder in the year prior
to Wave 1 were used to examine violence between Waves
1 and 2.
Results Those with SMI, irrespective of substance abuse
status, were significantly more likely to be violent than
those with no mental or substance use disorders. This
finding held in both bivariate and multivariable models.
Those with comorbid mental and substance use disorders
had the highest risk of violence. Historical and current
conditions were also associated with violence, including
childhood abuse and neglect, household antisocial behavior,
binge drinking and stressful life events.
Conclusions These results, in contrast to a recently published
report, show that the NESARC data are consistent
with the consensus view on mental disorder and violence:
there is a statistically significant, yet modest relationship
between SMI (within 12 months) and violence, and a
stronger relationship between SMI with substance use
disorder and violence. These results also highlight the
importance of premorbid conditions, and other contemporaneous
clinical factors, in violent behavior.