Delegation of Managers in Administrative systems of Iran

ABSTRACT:Today,in political and official sciencestheconcept ofcentralized and decentralizedindifferent cases is used asanAmbiguousand complex. The root of thisconfusionisin the political and socialviews andopinions of the society. So that in any type of political and social system somewhat of extreme in centralization of power and decision making can be seen. Centralization and decentralization in any form is the epitome of power in decision making.The point that should be considered is that theconcept of centralization in action will not appear as a pure Manifest and emergence but its imagination is somehow comparative with different levels of centralization.In organizational centralization the relationships among various government structures are not important. But organizational centralization is a matter of authority management of an office that shall be taken by the president or his deputies. While decentralization is when managers, bosses and each member of organization will be able to decide about duties and responsibilities toward duties and have enough and suit Authority with his responsibility. So the basis of organizational decentralization is authority adaptation or more authority transference to staffs and managers of different levels of organization by related boss. It is obvious that Effects and consequences caused by organizational centralization or in other words not delegated enough power to subordinate managers of the local administration in a centralized bureaucratic organization, will intensify official problems.Therefore some of the disadvantages and of Inappropriate effects caused by centralized administrative system can be given in action by complete or extraordinary powerto authorities and local officers or in other words to be overcome organizational decentralization policy.