Author/Authors :
Fakharian، Atefeh نويسنده , , Hamidi، Nima نويسنده Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., TEHRAN-IRAN. , , Haji Hosseinloo، Behnam نويسنده Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., TEHRAN-IRAN. , , Rezaei، Samira نويسنده Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., TEHRAN-IRAN. , , Ehteshami Afshar ، Elnaz نويسنده Department of Pulmonary Medicine, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., TEHRAN-IRAN. , , Sharif-Kashani، Babak نويسنده , , Behzadnia، Neda نويسنده , , Bakhshayesh Karam، Mehrdad نويسنده , , Gachkar، Latif نويسنده , , Emami، Habib نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from
pulmonary parenchymal diseases. Diagnosis of PH has always been a major clinical dilemma due to its non-specific clinical
manifestations. However, diagnosing PH and determining its severity are essential for the prognosis and treatment planning
in PH patients. This study aimed at evaluating the correlation between the pulmonary artery diameter (PAD) in the CT-scan
and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) in echocardiography of patients.
Materials and Methods: PAD was evaluated in the CT-scan of 117 patients suffering from interstitial lung disease (ILD) and
the correlation between PAD and PAP was studied. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) which is indicative
of the precision of the diagnostic test was drawn to find the cut off point for the MPAD representing PH. The area under the
curve was also calculated in order to define the discriminative power of the test.
Results: PAP higher than 25 mmHg was considered as PH. PAD over 29 mm reported in the CT-scan for the diagnosis of
PH in ILD patients had sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 41.5%. No significant linear correlation was found between PAD
and PAP (P-value=0.17, r=0.15). The area under the ROC curve was calculated to be 0.49 in the cutoff point of 29 mm for
determining PH (CI 95%=0.38-0.60, P=0.89).
Conclusion: ROC curve showed a weak discriminative power. PAD had low sensitivity and specificity in the CT-scan for the
diagnosis of PH. Therefore, we conclude that CT-scan alone is not helpful in finding PH cases and further examinations are
required.