Author/Authors :
Lone، Yasir Ahmad نويسنده Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India , , Dar، Abdul Majeed نويسنده Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India , , Sharma، Mukand Lal نويسنده Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India , , Robbani، Irfan نويسنده Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India , , Sarmast، Arif Hussain نويسنده Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India , , Mushtaq، Enas نويسنده Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India , , Kachroo، Mohammad Yousuf نويسنده Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India , , Khan، Omar Masood نويسنده Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India ,
Abstract :
Background: This study aimed at evaluating the outcome of surgery for bullous
lung disease by comparing the preoperative and postoperative subjective
dyspnea score, pulmonary function and clinical features.
Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted from May 2009
to October 2011, on 54 patients operated for bullous lung disease. Follow-up at
3-6 months consisted of taking a comprehensive history, physical examination,
radiological work-up, and evaluation of changes in subjective dyspnea score,
arterial blood gas analysis (ABG), and pulmonary function test (PFT). After
comparison with preoperative values, the student’s paired t-test was used to
calculate the statistical significance.
Results: With approximately 21.6 cases per year, the most common underlying
lung pathology was primary bullous lung disease, followed by COPD. The
most common presenting complaint was spontaneous pneumothorax in tall
young adults in their fourth decade of life with a history of smoking.
Bullectomy, with or without decortication, was done for all cases. Improvement
in mean PaO2 (arterial partial pressure of oxygen), SaO2 (arterial oxygen
saturation) and PaCO2 (arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide) was seen in
most cases but was statistically insignificant. Improvement in mean FEV1
(forced expiratory volume in 1st second), FVC (forced vital capacity) and FEV1
/ FVC was statistically significant, with FEV1 being the most reliable indicator
of postoperative progress. Improvement in subjective dyspnea score was
statistically significant and showed an inverse correlation with FEV1. Those
with diffuse pulmonary parenchymal involvement had poorer baseline values
and less significant postoperative improvement. Complications occurred more
commonly in those with diffuse disease. Mortality was seen exclusively in those
with diffuse disease.
Conclusion: We conclude that surgery is required for bullous lung disease
more frequently in our community since we have a high number of young
patients with primary bullous lung disease and localized parenchymal
involvement and these patients have a good surgical outcome. Potentially fatal
complications like pneumothorax and recurrent infections can therefore be
prevented in them. Those with underlying diffuse disease and severely
decreased FEV1 (especially below 1 L) also benefit from surgery but require
careful patient selection.