Author/Authors :
Ghorbani، Ali نويسنده Lung Transplantation Research Center, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., TEHRAN-IRAN. , , Abbasi Dezfouli، Azizollah نويسنده , , Shadmehr، Mohammad-Behgam نويسنده , , Pejhan، Saviz نويسنده , , Saghebi، Seyed Reza نويسنده Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., TEHRAN-IRAN. , , Ghare-Daghi، Aba-saad نويسنده Lung Transplantation Research Center, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., TEHRAN-IRAN. , , Farzanegan، Roya نويسنده , , Jahanshahi، Nahid نويسنده Lung Transplantation Research Center, NRITLD, Shahid Beheshti University M.C., TEHRAN-IRAN. ,
Abstract :
Background: Tracheal stenosis is still a serious consequence of endotracheal
intubation. Previous classification systems are commonly descriptive and are
not intended to deal with management approach. The aim of this study was to
present a classification system for post intubation tracheal stenosis and evaluate
its efficacy in distinguishing critically ill patients who need surgical
intervention.
Materials and Methods: This classification system was developed based on size
and type of stenosis and associated clinical signs and symptoms. Stenosis was
graded based on the results of clinical examination and rigid bronchoscopy. All
patients received surgical or conservative treatment based on the judgment of a
surgeon experienced in management of post-intubation tracheal stenosis
without considering their score. ROC curve analysis was done and cut-off point
was established based on the greatest Youden index.
Results: Sixty patients were studied. Resection and anastomosis were done for
49 patients. The mean score for all samples was 9.18 (range 8.77-9.45). Chosen
cutoff point was 8.5 and calculated sensitivity and specificity were 89% and
42%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 83.7% and
54.5%, respectively. A reasonable agreement between the estimated score and
surgeon’s clinical judgment (kappa=0.78) was observed. A statistically
significant relationship was observed between scores greater than 8.5 and need
for surgical intervention (P= 0.007).
Conclusion: We presented a scoring system for post-intubation and
tracheostomy tracheal stenosis using main factors influencing diagnosis and
treatment and its efficacy was evaluated prospectively. It seems that this system
would be capable of assimilating the treatment interventions and comparing
them.