Author/Authors :
Guillem Chust، نويسنده , , Ibon Galparsoro، نويسنده , , ?ngel Borja، نويسنده , , Javier Franco، نويسنده , , Adolfo Uriarte، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
The airborne laser scanning LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging) provides high-resolution Digital Terrain Models (DTM) that have been
applied recently to the characterization, quantification and monitoring of coastal environments. This study assesses the contribution of LIDAR
altimetry and intensity data, topographically-derived features (slope and aspect), and multi-spectral imagery (three visible and a near-infrared
band), to map coastal habitats in the Bidasoa estuary and its adjacent coastal area (Basque Country, northern Spain). The performance of highresolution
data sources was individually and jointly tested, with the maximum likelihood algorithm classifier in a rocky shore and a wetland
zone; thus, including some of the most extended Cantabrian Sea littoral habitats, within the Bay of Biscay. The results show that reliability
of coastal habitat classification was more enhanced with LIDAR-based DTM, compared with the other data sources: slope, aspect, intensity
or near-infrared band. The addition of the DTM, to the three visible bands, produced gains of between 10% and 27% in the agreement measures,
between the mapped and validation data (i.e. mean producer’s and user’s accuracy) for the two test sites. Raw LIDAR intensity images are only
of limited value here, since they appeared heterogeneous and speckled. However, the enhanced Lee smoothing filter, applied to the LIDAR
intensity, improved the overall accuracy measurements of the habitat classification, especially in the wetland zone; here, there were gains up
to 7.9% in mean producer’s and 11.6% in mean user’s accuracy. This suggests that LIDAR can be useful for habitat mapping, when few
data sources are available. The synergy between the LIDAR data, with multi-spectral bands, produced high accurate classifications (mean
producer’s accuracy: 92% for the 16 rocky habitats and 88% for the 11 wetland habitats). Fusion of the data enabled discrimination of intertidal
communities, such as Corallina elongata, barnacles (Chthamalus spp.), and stands of Spartina alterniflora and Phragmites australis, which
presented misclassification when conventional visible bands were used alone. All of these results were corroborated by the kappa coefficient
of agreement. The high classification accuracy found here, selecting data sources, highlights the value of integrating LIDAR data with
multi-spectral imagery for habitat mapping in the intertidal complex fringe.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords :
Coast , classification , Habitat mapping , Estuary , LIDAR , intertidal