Title of article :
Prey versus substrate as determinants of habitat choice in a feeding shorebird
Author/Authors :
Paul G. Finn، نويسنده , , Carla P. Catterall، نويسنده , , Peter V. Driscoll، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Abstract :
Many shorebirds on their non-breeding grounds feed on macrobenthic fauna which become available at
low tide in coastal intertidal flats. The Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis in Moreton Bay
Australia, varies greatly in density among different tidal flats. This study asks: how important is the
abundance of intertidal prey as a predictor of this variation? We quantified feeding curlews’ diet across
12 sites (different tidal flats, each re-visited at least eight times), through 970 focal observations.We also
estimated the abundance of total macrobenthic fauna, potential prey taxa and crustacean prey on each
tidal flat; measured as the number of individuals and a relative biomass index per unit substrate surface
area obtained from substrate core samples. We estimated curlew density at each site using low-tide
surveys from every site visit.
Curlew density showed a strong positive association with both the density and biomass of fauna and of
potential prey (r values all around 0.70) across the 12 flats. Associations with crustacean density and
biomass were also statistically significant (r values both 0.60). However, these variables also showed
a strong negative correlation with a measure of substrate resistance (based on the amount of hard
material in the substrate core), which was the best predictor of curlew density (r¼ 0.82). Curlews were
most abundant at sites with the least resistant substrate, and these sites also generally had the highest
faunal density and biomass. When the effect of substrate resistance was statistically removed, curlew
density was no longer significantly correlated with fauna density and biomass. This suggests that macroscale
habitat choice by Eastern Curlew on their non-breeding grounds is more strongly influenced by
prey availability (which is higher when substrate resistance is lower) than by prey density or biomass,
although in Moreton Bay a positive correlation across sites meant that these factors were synergistic.
Keywords :
habitat selectionforaging behaviourCharadriiwintering groundssubstrate penetrabilitymacrobenthosAustralia , Moreton Bay
Journal title :
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Journal title :
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science