Title of article :
Let us make impact assessment more accessible
Author/Authors :
Charles C. Alton، نويسنده , , P. Benjamin Underwood، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
دوماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2003
Abstract :
Impact assessment professionals have traditionally written documents for themselves. Often, their work appears to be received with indifference by business professionals and decision makers who have different needs and interests. The two groups conflict when they should be thinking and planning together at the “big picture” level (including the understanding of the social factors at work in environmental impact assessment) and developing related and workable “site-specific” implementation that characterizes socially acceptable decision making.To achieve this goal, the IA professional needs to rethink the approach. IA professionals often focus on the traditional “physical” environment, confining the assessment to facts and figures about hard aspects of the environment. Reams of detailed data are compiled to demonstrate impact assessment and to achieve a degree of certainty and precision. However, the sheer bulk of data assures that it will not be read by those who most need to use it. The IA professional must learn to prepare assessments that effectively consider less quantifiable, “softer” aspects of the environment.
We advocate preparation of an impact analysis that management decision makers and environmental stewards can use as a reference tool. The goal is to reduce or eliminate the hundreds of unread pages containing lengthy modeling runs and obscure details, and instead to prepare documents that are useful in both courtroom and boardroom. This convenient and quick-study “consumer report” style combines with a tiered decision making process that assures broad long-term thinking and planning, and focused short-term detailed implementation, using a level of detail appropriate to the decision at hand. This methodology integrates social factors into decision making, so as to provide meaningful discussion and analysis.
These principles, which have been proven in US boardrooms and courtrooms, will be illustrated with actual examples from broad policy-level impact assessments undertaken by the Bonneville Power Administration, and successfully implemented in managerial- and project-level actions.
Keywords :
Planning , implementation , Policy-level , social assessment , Big picture , Social factors , Short-term , Long-term
Journal title :
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Journal title :
Environmental Impact Assessment Review