Mount stirling: Political and environmental convergence for sustainable development

The paper briefly reports the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process undertaken in 1994–1996 into the future of Mount Stirling in Victoria, Australia, which was targeted for development as an integrated ski resort. The EIA process was preceded by extreme controversy about the proposed use of the mountain for downhill skiing and the use of a legal injunction to stall the proposed development. It represents a rare example where government used the EIA process to find the best overall solution to a public policy issue. A consultative committee (including interest groups and community representatives) was involved in scoping the environmental impact statement (EIS), writing the study brief, selecting a consultant, and guiding the preparation of the EIS. A framework for evaluating alternatives based on sustainable development principles was developed during preparation of the EIS. A number of alternatives, ranging from “no development” to a comprehensive ski resort and village, were generated; and natural, social and economic data were integrated in the analysis of alternatives. An independent panel was appointed to hear submissions on all alternatives and to recommend the best solution to government. The case study reinforced two key premises. First, it underscored the value of undertaking a strategic assessment that incorporated a wide range of alternatives, and integrated technical, environmental, social and economic information in the EIS and decision-making process. Second, it demonstrates that environmental dispute resolution can be achieved through a focus on the requirements of distributive, procedural, and relational justice.