Abstract :
Policy-makers and the public, it has famously been said [Brooks, H. (1986) Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, Cambridge
University Press, p. 325], are more interested in the possibility of non-linear dislocations and surprises in the behavior of the
environment than in smooth extrapolations of current trends. How indeed should we design our models to generate environmental
foresight, to detect, in particular, threats to our environment lying ‘just beyond the horizon’? In facing this prospect of potentially
profound dislocations in behavior, the problem is that the number of state variables in the model, whether they interact, how they
interact, and the form of their interactions, may be evolving over time. What may have appeared to have been an insignificant mode
of behavior in the pastdburied within the uncertainty of the model and the historical datadmay come to dominate behavior in the
future. Technically, we may call this a change of structure. The concern of the paper is to address the challenge of constructing and
employing models to generate environmental foresight in the presence of structural change. A number of case histories, ranging
across lake eutrophication, urban ozone levels, the restoration of ecosystems, the circulation of waters in the North Atlantic, and the
invasion of exotic species, are used to construct a much more immediate sense of the nature of structural change and, therefore, the
character of the challenge of generating environmental foresight. Some mathematical and logical formalities are then introduced,
both to define the issues more sharply and to open up the means with which to address them. This provides an opportunity to take
stock of three rather different programs of model-building used, over the decades, to generate environmental foresight. We close by
illustrating a set of possible responses to the essential challenge through a number of contemporary case studies: in assessing, inter
alia, the reachability of the lay community’s hopes and fears for the future of their cherished piece of the environment; in
apprehending and diagnosing the possibility of imminent structural change; and in examining the record of the past for emergence of
the seeds of any such structural change.
Keywords :
Surprise , Sensitivity analysis , watershed management , Adaptive control and management , Analysis of uncertainty , Cultural theory , Reachable futures , Stakeholderfutures , Recursive estimation