• Title of article

    Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation

  • Author/Authors

    Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng، نويسنده , , Cheng-Wei Lin، نويسنده , , Serafim Opricovic، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    دوهفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
  • Pages
    11
  • From page
    1373
  • To page
    1383
  • Abstract
    The technological development of buses with new alternative fuels is considered in this paper. Several types of fuels are considered as alternative-fuel modes, i.e., electricity, fuel cell (hydrogen), and methanol. Electric vehicles may be considered the alternative-fuel vehicles with the lowest air pollution. Hybrid electric vehicles provide an alternate mode, at least for the period of improving the technology of electric vehicles. A hybrid electric vehicle is defined as a vehicle with the conventional internal combustion engine and an electric motor as its major sources of power. Experts from different decision-making groups performed the multiple attribute evaluation of alternative vehicles. AHP is applied to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria. TOPSIS and VIKOR are compared and applied to determine the best compromise alternative fuel mode. The result shows that the hybrid electric bus is the most suitable substitute bus for Taiwan urban areas in the short and median term. But, if the cruising distance of the electric bus extends to an acceptable range, the pure electric bus could be the best alternative.
  • Keywords
    Alternative fuel , Public transportation , Electric bus , Compromise solution , Multi-criteria analysis , TOPSIS , VIKOR
  • Journal title
    Energy Policy
  • Serial Year
    2005
  • Journal title
    Energy Policy
  • Record number

    970542