Title of article :
The cost effectiveness of contaminated land remediation stategies
Author/Authors :
S.J. Day، نويسنده , , G.K. Morse، نويسنده , , J.N. Lester، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
هفته نامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1997
Pages :
12
From page :
125
To page :
136
Abstract :
British Gas has a major programme of contaminated land remediation, reclaiming the sites of many former gasworks for other beneficial uses. On behalf of its customers and shareholders, the company must ensure that its approach to remediation is as cost-effective as possible, while meeting all environmental obligations. The development of two disured sites presented the opportunity to examine the cost benefit of remediation, both in terms of the level of site investigation needed to minimise unforeseen costs in the subsequent remediation phase, and to compare the relative costs of alternative remediation techniques. The case studies demonstrated a substantial cost benefit of an extensive site investigation prior to remediation works, while a comparative analysis of remediation techniques concluded that landfill was the least expensive, compared with bioremediation and soils washing. However, with the addition of the landfill tax, the costs of alternatives to landfill disposal become more comparable. As more experience is gained of the new techniques, costs should fall, helping to encourage a wider choice of cost-effective remediation approaches in the UK.
Keywords :
Cost-effectiveness , Bioremediation , Landfill , remediation , Soils washing , Gasworks
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
Serial Year :
1997
Journal title :
Science of the Total Environment
Record number :
980300
Link To Document :
بازگشت