Author/Authors :
Sergey V. Fesenko a، نويسنده , , ?، نويسنده , , Rudolf M. Alexakhin b، نويسنده , , Mikhail I. Balonov a، نويسنده , ,
Iossif M. Bogdevitch c، نويسنده , , Brenda J. Howard، نويسنده , , Valery A. Kashparov e، نويسنده , ,
Natalia I. Sanzharova b، نويسنده , , Alexey V. Panov b، نويسنده , , Gabriele Voigt، نويسنده , , Yury M. Zhuchenka f، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Awide range of different countermeasures has been used to mitigate the consequences of the Chernobyl accident for agriculture
in affected regions in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. The paper comprehensively brings together key data on countermeasure
application over twenty years for all three countries and critically evaluates the response to the accident with respect to agriculture.
The extents of countermeasures implementation in various periods following the ChNPP accident are documented. Examples of
best practices and drawbacks in remediation of affected areas are identified. Data on the effectiveness of agricultural
countermeasures have been evaluated and the impact of countermeasures implementation to mitigate consequences of the accident
has been assessed for the period 1986–2006. Implementation of agricultural countermeasures averted 30–40% of the internal
collective dose that would have been received by the residents of affected regions without the use of countermeasures. The current
situation in agriculture of areas subjected to contamination following the Chernobyl accident is described. Current and future needs
for remediation, including a consideration of various strategies of rehabilitation of affected areas are presented.
Keywords :
agriculture , Chernobyl NPP , Consequences , remediation , Countermeasures